Iran Nuclear Program and Upcoming IAEA Session
Iran nuclear program and activity has been the spotlight of IAEA since a long time ago. It is not considered as a new subject dating back to early 1950s, becoming more serious by founding Atomic Energy Organization of Iran as well as concluding contract of construction Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
Iran aimed to fulfil the full fuel cycle within 20 years and supplying 23,000 Megawatt of Electricity through 22 nuclear power plants.
Certain contracts were signed with France, USA and former West Germany in order to mount Atomic Reactor. France guaranteed supplying Uranium required by Iran. Iran purchased 10 percent of EURODIF (European Gaseous Diffusion Uranium Enrichment) being obliged to supply 270 Ton of Enriched Uranium up to 3,67 percent for Iran.
Long-term agreements were arranged with France, West Germany and USA. Furthermore, bilateral cooperation ‘contracts were also signed with Belgium, Canada, France, Italy, USA and West Germany as well making numerous students dispatch to the different countries.
After the victory of Islamic Revolution of Iran, all the contracts and cooperation agreements with other states faced severe complications resulting in practical interruption.
This was contemplated as the very first political and selective conflicts and measures taken against Iran Nuclear Program, which still continues emerging in other forms. Whereas Billion dollars had been imposed in Iran with thousands human force and students allocated to the affair.
Endeavors regarding negotiation with West Germany and France were futile. Even due to rejection of repayment request regarding the construction of Bushehr Power Plant by Germany, Iran intended to file a petition, which ended up in vain.
Owing to breaching of commitments by Western States as well as immoral and political sabotages, Iran opted for another should not to fulfil its needs and indigenization of this industry.”
On 2002, reports of certain western counties and Zionist Regime derailed the Islamic Republic of Iran Nuclear Program from its ordinary course, even though Iran had not breached any international commitment acting based on its responsibilities and liabilities regarding IAEA.
Statement of three European States initially being the negotiation party of Iran, resolution of Security Council approved December 2006, Cooperation agreement of Iran with IAEA on February 2007 as well as unjust and ruthless sanctions imposed on Iran are still on their way. By lobbying Israeli and western States, these negotiations have turned out to be a dead-end.
IAEA proceeded with Equivocal and contradictory statements, though Iran has been under the most severe scrutiny of the Agency despite existence of relevant transparency. General Director has frequently stated that Iran is not equipped with Nuclear Weapons. However, the reward of all these cooperation has been nothing but reprimand and penalty. The issues of cancellation the permission of certain inspectors as well as limitations inflicted on the site have been deemed as a hindrance for peaceful nature of nuclear programs. Whereas, it shall not be expected that Iran act as before as long as all the sanctions are still in Place Additionally, non-issuance of Visa for a handful number of inspectors of Agency against issuing Visa for more than 100 inspectors shall not be considered as an acceptable alibi from IAEA; though the measure taken has been contemplated as a fundamental right for Iran emphasized on Article 9 of Comprehensive Agreement with IAEA. It is recommended that the Agency appoint uncontroversial experts merely focusing on their duties.
Mr. Grossi, Director General of IAEA, has stated that the dead-end experienced with North Korea Should not be repeated regarding Iran. This is a heedful position being up to him and IAEA as well not to challenge the negotiations with Iran benefiting from previous experiences. The western party has breached agreement since beginning becoming an abominable process.
The breach of Saad Abad, Brussel and Paris Agreements, United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action as well as indifference position of Europe are regarded as remarkable examples of the performance of other party and nonconfidence of Iran. It is absolutely crucial that the good faith, commitment and adherence of Iran be responded with a professional similar action not influenced by pressure groups.
Should the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) impartially and professionally assess Safeguard issues without prejudice while overlooking exaggeration not taking into consideration the political ambience, the next session of IAEA on March, shall be considered as a proper opportunity and milestone towards the cooperation of Iran and IAEA; Unfortunately, the IAEA performs in a way leading towards the perception that such performance feeds pressure from Western States and Israel over Iran which is a predetermined mission. Should the performance of Iran be impartially evaluated within past two decades. a negative and equivocal report from IAEA shall not be expected. The safeguard issues shall not be taken into account based on hostility, frame-up and accusation can we witness a turning point in up coming session.
However, the danger lurks in another place, where the Zionist Regime propounds using Nuclear Weapons on crime against Gaza’s Citizens by Israels ministers. Doesn’t the IAEA feel moral responsibility in this regard?
